
THE BULGARIAN PEOPLE UNDER THE RULE OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE 15th-l8th CC
The fall of the medieval Bulgarian states under
the Ottoman rule interrupted the Bulgarian people's natural development within
the framework of the European civilization. To the Bulgarians that was not just
a temporary loss of their state independence as it was in the case of other
European peoples which had had this bitter experience at different stages of
their history. In the course of centuries the Bulgarians were forced to live
under a state and political system that was substantially different from and
distinctly alien to the European civilization which had evolved on the basis of
Christianity and the Christian economic, social and cultural patterns. The
intrusive nature of Islamism and its intolerance to anything that was not part
of it, resulted in the continued confrontation between the Ottoman empire and
Christian Europe in the l5th-l8th centuries. That fact drew an iron curtain
between the Bulgarian people on the one side, and Europe and the free Slav
countries on the other. In other words, Bulgaria was separated from the
progressive trends of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment as well as from the
nascent modern bourgeois world. The Bulgarians were pushed into a direction of
development which had nothing in common with their seven-century history until
then, history deeply connected with the natural course of the European
political, economic and cultural development.
The Turkish conquerors ruthlessly destroyed all Bulgarian state and religious
structures. The natural political leaders of the people in the Middle Ages, i.e.
the boyars and the higher clergy, vanished from sight. That deprived the
Bulgarians of both the possibility for self-organization and any chance of
having foreign political allies for centuries on end.
The place allotted to the Bulgarian people in the Ottoman feudal political
system entitled it to no legal, religious, national, even biological rights as
Bulgarian Christians. They had all been reduced to the category of the so called
rayah (meaning 'a flock', attributed to the non-Muslim subjects of the empire).
The peasants who represented the better half of the Bulgarian population were
dispossessed of their land. According to the Ottoman feudal system which
remained effective until 1834, all of it belonged to the central power in the
person of the Turkish sultan. The Bulgarians were allowed to cultivate only some
plots. Groups of rural Christian families, varying in number, were put under an
obligation to give part of their income to representatives of the Muslim
military, administrative and religious upper crust, as well as to fulfil various
state duties. The number of the families liable to that payment was determined
according to their position in the Ottoman state, military and religious
hierarchy. The establishment of that kind of intercourse in agriculture - the
fundamental pillar of the economy at that time, clearly led to the total loss of
motivation for any real farming or and production improvements both among the
peasants and the feof-holders. The complex and incredibly burdensome tax system
forced the farmers to produce as much as needed for their families' subsistence,
while the feudals preferred to earn a lot more from looting and from the
incessantly successful wars waged by the Ottoman empire in all directions until
the end of the 17th century.
The Ottoman Turkish state was founded on and propped up by the dogmas of the
Koran. At the beginning of the 15th century when the empire prostrated from
India to Gibraltar and from the mouth of the Volga to Vienna, it proclaimed
itself the supreme leader of Islam - Prophet Mohammed's standard and sword, and
a leader of the Koran-prescribed perpetual jihad (holy war) against the world of
Christianity. It went without saying that under this conception the Bulgarian
Christians could not hope for any. access to even the lowest levels of
statecraft. The enormous imperial bureaucratic machinery recruited its staff
only from among Muslims.
The Bulgarian people was subjected to national and religious discrimination
unheard of in the annals of all European history. During court proceedings, for
example, a single Muslim's testimony was more than enough to confute the
evidence of dozens of Christian witnesses. The Bulgarians were not entitled to
building churches, setting up their offices or even to wearing bright colors. Of
the numerous taxes (about 80 in number) the so called 'fresh blood tax' (a levy
of Christian youths) was particularly heavy and humiliating. At regular
intervals, the authorities had the healthiest male- children taken away from
their parents, sent to the capital, converted into Islam and then trained in
combat skills. Raised and trained in the spirit of Islamic fanaticism, the young
men were conscripted in the so called janissary corps, the imperial army of
utmost belligerence known to have caused so much trouble and suffering to both
the Bulgarians and Christian Europe.
The Turkish authorities exerted unabating pressure on parts of the Bulgarian
people to make them convert their faith and become Muslims. That policy was
meant to limit the Bulgarian ethnos parameters and to increase the Turkish
population numbers. For, according to the medieval standards in that part of
Europe, the affiliation of a given people was determined by the religion it
followed. With a view to facilitating the assimilation process, the Turkish
authorities took the Christian names of those who had converted into Islam and
gave them Arab names instead.
A variety of ways and means was used in the assimilation of the Bulgarian
people. Some of these were the aforementioned 'blood tax, and the regular
kidnaping of children, pretty women, girls and young men to Turkish families.
Quite frequently, whole areas were encircled by troops and their inhabitants
forced to adopt Islam and new Arab names, while the objectors were 'edifyingly'
slain. In those cases, however, the 'new Muslims' were allowed to go on living
in the compact Bulgarian environment, i.e. as a community which retained both
its language and its Bulgarian national consciousness. The present-day Bulgarian
Muslims representing about five percent of modern Bulgaria's population, are
descendants of those Mohammedanized Bulgarians, whom the Bulgarian Christians
used to call pomaks (from the Bulgarian root-words macha or maka, meaning
harassed or caused to suffer). And yet the thousands of Bulgarians whom Bulgaria
lost once and for all were those who had been subjected to individual conversion
to Islam. For, it is only natural that having fallen into a community of
strangers, speaking a different language and practicing different customs and
faith, they had easily and quickly been assimilated. The genocide carried out by
the Ottoman Turks during hostilities in the Bulgarian lands, at the time of
uprising or riot suppression, during the frequent spells of feudal anarchy, or
even of Ottoman troops move-ups from garrison stations to the battle-field, had
struck heavy blows on the Bulgarian nation. The Bulgarian Christian population
was treated as infidel and hostile and it was outlawed even at the time of
peace. Individual and mass emigration of Bulgarians to foreign lands was another
cause for no lesser losses to the Bulgarian nation. There were times when whole
regions became depopulated. Thus, in 1688-1689 the whole of the north- eastern
Bulgarian population emigrated and in 1829-1830 the same thing happened with the
population of southeastern Bulgaria, Thrace, etc. Unprotected by Bulgarian
state, religious and cultural institutions the immigrants, with only few
exceptions, amalgamated into the people whose country had received them. That
was the way in which thousands of Bulgarian immigrants had vanished in Romania,
Hungary and Serbia.
During the l5th-l7th centuries the Bulgarian nation had suffered a gradual but
grave biological collapse which predetermined, to a large extent, its
demographic, economic, political and cultural place in the European
civilization. According to some Bulgarian historians' estimations, the beginning
of the Turkish oppression in the 15th century found Bulgaria with a population
of about 1.3 million. Those were the then demographic parameters of any of the
large European nations, for example, the population in the present-day
territories of England, France or Germany. One hundred years later, the
Bulgarians were already down to 260 000 people and remained as many in the
course of two more centuries. The demographic growth was suppressed through
genocide, Mohammedanization and emigration. The biological collapse of the
l5th-l7th centuries had repercussions which are still being keenly felt. The
Bulgarian nation, nowadays, amounts to some ten million people while its
European equals in number, back in the 15th century, are now sixty to eighty
million-strong.
The unbearable conditions during the Ottoman yoke could not deaden the
Bulgarians' anxiety for resistance. Deprived of social and political
organizations of their own, they were unable to undertake any sizeable
liberation initiatives. Thus, during the first centuries of the oppression,
armed resistance was only of local and sporadic nature. The so-called haidouk
movement was its most frequent manifestation. The haidouks were brave Bulgarians
who took refuge in the high-mountain woods, organizing there small armed
detachments and bringing them down for merciless struggle against the provincial
administrators. This guerrila-type struggle continued for centuries on end (one
group destroyed was instantaneously replaced by another) and succeeded in
sustaining the morale of the Bulgarians by preserving, to some extent, their
properties and their honor. In some places, it even had the authorities maintain
more humane relationships with the Bulgarian Christians. The haidouk movement
indirectly encouraged and safeguarded other forms of resistance such as
maintaining the style of life, the language, the traditions and the religion, or
incompliance with forced obligations and refusal to pay heavy unjustifed tax.
Liberation uprisings were the supreme form of struggle against the oppressors.
The first one broke out still in 1408. Significant uprisings, proclaiming the
independence of Bulgaria, took place in 1598, 1686, 1688 and 1689. They were
connected with the anti- Ottoman wars waged by the West European Catholic states
with which some Bulgarian representatives, mainly merchants and both Orthodox
and Catholic clergymen, had established joint venture contacts. All
insurrections were quelled and accompanied with inhuman atrocities.
The Bulgarian people were living through one of the most difficult periods in
its centuries long existence. It had been deprived of its state, its church, its
intelligently and its legitimate rights. Furthermore, its survival as an ethnos
had also been put at stake. Linder the heel of that powerful, ruthless and
uncivilized Asiatic despotism, it lasted out but remained without any
substantial material and spiritual resources needed for its further development.
Thus, the Bulgarians, along with all the other European peoples which had been
engulfed by the Ottoman empire, were to lag some centuries behind the
attainments of present-day Europe.

Map of Ottoman Empire
|